Review



esd margin status  (GE Healthcare)


Bioz Verified Symbol GE Healthcare is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 93
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    GE Healthcare esd margin status
    Logistic regression for factors associated with having esophagectomy necessity after <t> ESD </t> for Esophageal cancer*
    Esd Margin Status, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1667 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/esd margin status/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 93 stars, based on 1667 article reviews
    esd margin status - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Esophagectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma"

    Article Title: Esophagectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma

    Journal: Journal of Thoracic Disease

    doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.143

    Logistic regression for factors associated with having esophagectomy necessity after ESD for Esophageal cancer*
    Figure Legend Snippet: Logistic regression for factors associated with having esophagectomy necessity after ESD for Esophageal cancer*

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    esd margin status  (GE Healthcare)
    93
    GE Healthcare esd margin status
    Logistic regression for factors associated with having esophagectomy necessity after <t> ESD </t> for Esophageal cancer*
    Esd Margin Status, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/esd margin status/product/GE Healthcare
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    esd margin status - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Logistic regression for factors associated with having esophagectomy necessity after ESD for Esophageal cancer*

    Journal: Journal of Thoracic Disease

    Article Title: Esophagectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma

    doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.143

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Logistic regression for factors associated with having esophagectomy necessity after ESD for Esophageal cancer*

    Article Snippet: The differences between T stages were not significant for ESD failure, complications after ESD, lymph node metastasis, positive tumor margin after ESD, and esophagectomy necessity ( ). table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 Factors Regression coefficient Wald value P OR (95% CI) Sex (male; female) −0.036 0.000 0.987 0.965 (0.014–67.659) Initial dysphagia symptom (no; yes) 3.470 0.350 0.554 32.143 (0.000–3166748.165) Comorbidity (none; cardiovascular; hepatic; diabetes) −0.938 0.759 0.384 0.392 (0.047–3.230) Body mass index (underweight; normal; overweight) −1.609 0.695 0.404 0.200 (0.005–8.790) Endoscopic tumor length (<5; 5–10; >10 cm) 0.119 0.005 0.946 1.127 (0.036–34.918) Tumor location (upper; middle; lower; GE junction) −2.136 1.386 0.239 0.118 (0.003–4.139) Intraluminal circumferential ratio (<0.25; 0.25–0.5; 0.5–0.75; 0.75–1.0) −0.605 0.694 0.405 0.546 (0.132–2.266) No. of lesions (1; >1) −3.586 1.312 0.252 0.028 (0.000–12.803) Complication after ESD (negative; positive) −28.218 0.000 0.999 0.000 (0.000–0.000) T stage after ESD (Tis; T1a; T1b; NA) −4.262 4.066 0.044 0.014 (0.000–0.887) Repeat ESD (no; yes) 25.874 0.000 0.999 0.000 (0.000–0.000) ESD margin status (negative; positive; NA) 6.983 6.055 0.014 1,078 (4.1–280,540) Open in a separate window *, model test: χ 2 =30.058, P=0.003.

    Techniques: